Ausmini
It is currently Tue Jun 24, 2025 3:50 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Weber firewall box
PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2014 6:18 am 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2012 1:39 pm
Posts: 583
Location: qld
Hi just saw a good clean example of air box for long weber manifold on davem's thread viewtopic.php?f=2&t=87955

and wondered, does anyone make them as a unit.... or have plans already made...
i know i can just use the CAMS info and make up a cardboard box pattern to start, but i was struck at how tidy the one in the photo looked
Cheers Darryl


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Weber firewall box
PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2014 6:50 am 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2013 8:38 pm
Posts: 680
Location: Wollongong
it does look very tidy im also keen on this information.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Weber firewall box
PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2014 7:06 am 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 5:22 pm
Posts: 780
Location: Quakers Hill
contact greg at mini classic, he has a guy who does his fab work, very nice quality, not to expensive either. Very excited today i should be picking up a order for the clubbie at DHL from KAD and carbon weezel this arvo, if all goes to plan!

_________________
SPO41 Mk2 Cooper S very original
1993 R32 Nissan Skyline GTR


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Weber firewall box
PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2014 4:12 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2012 1:39 pm
Posts: 583
Location: qld
light and shiny stuff... the clubbie will love you for it..... when is the phillip island oil squirter due back in action? thanks for the info re mini classic


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Weber firewall box
PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 3:02 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 2:15 pm
Posts: 425
Location: Perth, WA
Hey Darryl,

On a previous car for my Weber box, I just used a battery box from a boot section and modified it. It's a bit ghetto, but worked fine. I'll see if I can find some photos.

For my current car I'm pretty sure I bought a prefabbed weber box, but buggered if I know where from. Probably from eBay, I found this one but I'm sure I didn't pay that much... On the upside, it has the dimensions in the advert :)

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Mini-Weber-Bu ... 20f18ab420

Cheers,
Keels.

_________________
-Wasabi
1972 Clubman - Daily Driver
1962 850 - EW1 Powered


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Weber firewall box
PostPosted: Wed Dec 17, 2014 5:20 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2012 1:39 pm
Posts: 583
Location: qld
thanks keels, it is v big


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Weber firewall box
PostPosted: Wed Dec 17, 2014 5:48 pm 
Offline
religious status
religious status
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 6:19 pm
Posts: 39751
Location: near Baulkham Hills, NSW
If fitting a Weber box, don't make it too small.
One member here got one put in, and it cleared the short K&N Weber filter OK. But, this filter didn't flow enough air for the motor (with 120HP at the crank). He didn't want a Ramflo on there, so he was stuck with using 2x Unifilter socks.

[edit] manifold was an RE5".

_________________
DrMini- 1970 wasaMatic 1360, Mk1S crank, 86.6HP (ATW) =~125 @ crank, 45 Dellorto (38 chokes), RE282 sprint cam, 1.5 rockers, 11.0:1 C/R. :mrgreen:


Last edited by drmini in aust on Sun Dec 21, 2014 11:23 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Weber firewall box
PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 9:28 am 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2012 1:39 pm
Posts: 583
Location: qld
The cams group nb measurements look pretty small


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Weber firewall box
PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 2:38 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 7:23 pm
Posts: 614
Location: Gippsland, Victoria
Details of the CAMS approved Group N Weber box are posted below.
Note that the proposal was was based on safety concerns, not performance enhancement, so it had to be as small as was practical. I doubt that the proposal would have been accepted if there was an obvious or perceived performance advantage.

This is all that needs to be cut out:

Image

Image


PROPOSAL TO ALLOW THE INSTALLATION OF A CARBURETTOR BOX ON GROUP N MINIS
Background
The Mini body has an opening in the engine bay firewall behind the instrument cluster. This opening has no restriction to the entry of fluid or fumes to the interior of the car from the engine bay. The Mini instruments ( speedo, fuel gauge and oil pressure gauge ) are mounted to the instrument housing and there is a plastic cover that covers the area behind the instrument panel to the firewall. This plastic cover is all that separates the engine bay to the car interior
When a Mini is modified for competition by the addition of a Weber carburettor, the intake tubes of the carburettor can intrude through this hole into the car’s interior. The Weber carburettor’s fuel intake pipe is also at the edge of this opening.
This area has been of concern to Mini competitors due to possibility of fuel and fumes entering the car’s interior. The problem has been to how to seal off this area and not infringe the Group N regulations.
Long time Mini competitor, Ted Brewster, has designed a carburettor box that will seal off the engine bay to the interior with minimum of modification to the firewall.
Proposal
This proposal is to allow the modification of the engine firewall and allow the moving of the instrument cluster to permit the installation of this carburettor box.
The proposed box would be attached to the firewall by an integral flange on the engine side of the firewall and have the maximum front opening dimensions of 175mm high x 215mm wide measured at the face of the firewall. These dimensions only require a minimum amount of modification to the original firewall opening. The depth of the box would not be specified, however there would be a limit to the modifications to the car’s dashboard to retain the original appearance.
WHEN INSTALLED THE BOX MUST BE SELF DRAINING AWAY FROM THE CABIN COMPARTMENT INTERIOR.
The speedometer (including the original face, speed needle, trip meter, fuel gauge, glass and bezel), temperature gauge and oil pressure gauge must appear original and be retained in the original instrument housing. The instrument panel may be moved toward the interior of the car to a point where the speedometer bezel is in line with front of the top of the dashboard and the front of the parcel shelf. Refer photographs.
The freedom to install this carburettor box could be included in the Specification Sheets of the Group NB and NC Mini.
Conclusion
The box proposed provides a safe fluid and fumes firewall between the engine bay and the car interior. It does not detract from the visible originality of the car’s engine bay or interior. The box provides no performance advantage. The front opening dimensions would not provide a much greater area for the installation of cold air tubes than is currently available with the standard opening.
The compliance of the box can be easily checked with the maximum opening prescribed and the checking of the instrument panel and its placement.

_________________
Curly
'64 Cooper 'S' (Group Nb spec)
'67 Mini Marcos GT www.mm7056.wordpress.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Weber firewall box
PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 7:19 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2012 1:39 pm
Posts: 583
Location: qld
Thanks curly, that is good to see the actual proposal. Interesting, that the focus needed to be safety. Do you have info around other single make approvals, that seem to give an advantage against other makes? Eg mustang brakes .. For single make races it doesn't matter as they all have access to the same rule set. Interesting ta


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Weber firewall box
PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 7:44 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 7:23 pm
Posts: 614
Location: Gippsland, Victoria
FNQ wrote:
Thanks curly, that is good to see the actual proposal. Interesting, that the focus needed to be safety. Do you have info around other single make approvals, that seem to give an advantage against other makes? Eg mustang brakes .. For single make races it doesn't matter as they all have access to the same rule set. Interesting ta


It's impossible to keep up with the changes that are constantly occurring in Group N regulations. Each make and model have their own active pressure group looking to find an edge on the opposition. This type of politicing was one of the factors that eventually turned me away from Grp N racing :twisted:

_________________
Curly
'64 Cooper 'S' (Group Nb spec)
'67 Mini Marcos GT www.mm7056.wordpress.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

© 2016 Ausmini. All garage work involves equal measures of enthusiasm, ingenuity and a fair degree of irresponsibility.