Ausmini
It is currently Tue Jun 24, 2025 4:46 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:21 am 
Offline
1360cc
1360cc

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 6:46 pm
Posts: 13688
Location: ADL
'77 clubby van wrote:
It would be cool to have the sound, but to tell you the truth those figues don't impress me that much. :?



161 hp @ 7800 & 162 Nm @ 4500 for an expensive one off engine which sounds really cool and no one else has....

Vs

133 hp @ 6400 & 157 Nm @ 4800 for a cheap, standard 4efte which is easily upgradable with cheap parts with toyota reliability.

It does sound good though! 8)


You can't really compare a turbo to an NA there!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 8:20 pm 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 3183
Location: Burpengary, Queensland - Home of Tricky Performance Engineering
6-Bolt mains and linerless bores - love it!!!

This thing would absolutely haul ass in a mini....

_________________
"Not Speeding Officer..........Qualifying"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 4:31 am 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 6:21 am
Posts: 1788
Location: Wullingtun, Unzud
Morris 1100 wrote:
But like most V4s they vibrate badly. But these vibrate more than most. :lol: (maybe nearly as bad as a Harley.)


There's a world of difference between a V4 and a harley. Harleys vibrate because the angle between the cylinders is 45 degrees. Ducatis (also V twins) don't vibrate because the angle is 90 degrees. Japanese engineers couldn't bring themselves to build an engine as inherently bad as a HD motor, so the crankpins in my M50 (800cc v twin) are offset; it has a solid mounted motor and barely vibrates at all. My VFR750 (v four engine) was smooth as silk.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 10:18 am 
Offline
This space for rent
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:40 pm
Posts: 5455
Location: Melbourne
Lancia knew a thing or two about V4's too.. and their were good motors.

_________________
Simon

The adventures of an owner builder in the Tallarook Ranges

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 7:16 pm 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 3183
Location: Burpengary, Queensland - Home of Tricky Performance Engineering
Angusdog wrote:
Morris 1100 wrote:
But like most V4s they vibrate badly. But these vibrate more than most. :lol: (maybe nearly as bad as a Harley.)


There's a world of difference between a V4 and a Harley. Harleys vibrate because the angle between the cylinders is 45 degrees. Ducatis (also V twins) don't vibrate because the angle is 90 degrees. Japanese engineers couldn't bring themselves to build an engine as inherently bad as a HD motor, so the crankpins in my M50 (800cc v twin) are offset; it has a solid mounted motor and barely vibrates at all. My VFR750 (v four engine) was smooth as silk.


Honda found out the best angle in terms of comactness and anti-vibration is actually 52 degrees. I think all Honda V's, no matter whether they are V-Twin or V4, are 52 degress?

Cheers,
Tricky

_________________
"Not Speeding Officer..........Qualifying"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 8:41 pm 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 4:07 pm
Posts: 4682
Location: sunbury victoria
hmm thats a good alternative to a bike engine for a rwd sports sedan mini!

_________________
Potato


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 9:00 pm 
Offline
religious status
religious status
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 6:19 pm
Posts: 39751
Location: near Baulkham Hills, NSW
Tricky,
According to the great Australian engineer Phil Irving, who designed the Repco V8 (also wrote Tuning for Speed, and other books) a 90° V twin can have perfect primary balance. You just counterweight all the reciprocation component of 1 piston and rod, and none of the other. Then the forces balance each other out. Of course, the firing intervals are way uneven, but a Ducati in full song does sound great, hey!
Most V2s of lesser angles had it to save space, or for some other reason than balance.

_________________
DrMini- 1970 wasaMatic 1360, Mk1S crank, 86.6HP (ATW) =~125 @ crank, 45 Dellorto (38 chokes), RE282 sprint cam, 1.5 rockers, 11.0:1 C/R. :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 6:34 pm 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 3183
Location: Burpengary, Queensland - Home of Tricky Performance Engineering
Hey Doc,

Yep, you are 100% correct. A 90 degree twin (or mutliple thereof) is the easiest in terms of engineering out harmonic vibration and ensuring perfect primary balance.

Honda only went to the 52 degree V-Twin becuase it was a lot more compact - and it was only for that reason. I think they treied 75 degress, 60 degrees etc and then finally settled on 52 degrees.

And yes, nothing like a 90 degree Ducati at full song - love the desmodromic valve operation purring at 9000rpm!!! You Doc, have excellent taste Sir!

Cheers,
Tricky

_________________
"Not Speeding Officer..........Qualifying"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 6:39 pm 
Offline
Causing or creating vexation

Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:32 pm
Posts: 19124
drmini in aust wrote:
Tricky,
According to the great Australian engineer Phil Irving, who designed the Repco V8 (also wrote Tuning for Speed, and other books) a 90° V twin can have perfect primary balance. You just counterweight all the reciprocation component of 1 piston and rod, and none of the other. Then the forces balance each other out. Of course, the firing intervals are way uneven, but a Ducati in full song does sound great, hey!
Most V2s of lesser angles had it to save space, or for some other reason than balance.

So what was the angle of the HRD Vincent V twin that Phil Irving designed? (a lot less than 90°) :lol:
The problem with a lot of motors is not primary balance, it is secondary balance. The V4 chev speedway motor has bad secondary balance.
Comfort is not usually a high priority in speedway. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 8:46 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 4:41 pm
Posts: 665
Location: Inner West, Sydney
OT but I was just reading one of Phil Irving's books the other week. What a legend - I'll dig up some quotes. He "accidentally" designed his V twin when two sketches of his inline engine fell on top of one another, overlapping to form the V shape!

_________________
the internet wrote:
Like Audrey Hepburn, almost everybody loves the Mini. The only people who didn't love the Mini were pathetic, empty people.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 9:38 pm 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 7:19 pm
Posts: 5370
Location: Yandina,Sunshine Coast,QLD
How hard would it be to cut a V6 or V8 down yourself?
A 3.8L V6 commy will give you a 2533cc V4.....just a spur of the moment idea :roll:
But seriously how hard is it to cut a engine down and what would you need to look for?

_________________
Respect mine and I'll respect yours.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 9:42 pm 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 4:07 pm
Posts: 4682
Location: sunbury victoria
why cut one down when you can buy a proper speedway one for 7 or 8 grand

_________________
Potato


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 1:54 pm 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc

Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 2:38 pm
Posts: 2210
Location: Huon Valley, TAS
We used to have a V4 Ford Corsair 2000e. Not all V4's are a good thing.

Image

Same motor was used in the Capri 2000GT, and of course in a lesser form in the early Transit Vans.

Cheers,

Dicko


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:53 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 1:15 pm
Posts: 685
Location: Melbourne
Haha, we used to have a V4 transit van. That thing was hilarious. Used to hate going in it as a kid cause it was ex-spastic society pale blue and you could still make out where dad had pulled the signs off. Later on when I drove it I used to love it, high up truck driving position, revving the crap out of the V4 and going nowhere. Fun stuff. Think we sold it for $50 to the kids from round the corner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 8:47 pm 
Offline
religious status
religious status
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 6:19 pm
Posts: 39751
Location: near Baulkham Hills, NSW
There have been some very good V4s in this world, and also some very bad ones. That Ford V4 was the latter. :lol:

_________________
DrMini- 1970 wasaMatic 1360, Mk1S crank, 86.6HP (ATW) =~125 @ crank, 45 Dellorto (38 chokes), RE282 sprint cam, 1.5 rockers, 11.0:1 C/R. :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

© 2016 Ausmini. All garage work involves equal measures of enthusiasm, ingenuity and a fair degree of irresponsibility.