Ausmini
It is currently Sun Jul 06, 2025 7:37 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 1:21 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 4:41 pm
Posts: 665
Location: Inner West, Sydney
Howdy y'all,

I've done a search and found related discussion but none that answer this directly.

Can anyone tell me the power figures for the 1980s/90s Rover engines - ie 998 and EFI 1275. I can appreciate that the engineering (hopefully!) improved over the years, but also would like to hear about any power improvements etc. Not looking for a drag car by any means!

I was window shopping at Brikworx last week and had a chat with Steve, now I'm thinking about whether to go for a Jap Rover front cut for my 68 Deluxe, tho it will be a fair way into the future... so for now just trying to do my homework and get some options.

Cheers

_________________
the internet wrote:
Like Audrey Hepburn, almost everybody loves the Mini. The only people who didn't love the Mini were pathetic, empty people.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 2:39 pm 
Offline
religious status
religious status
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 6:19 pm
Posts: 39752
Location: near Baulkham Hills, NSW
Not sure about the 998, but the SPI 1275 was advertised as 61HP and the MPI, 63HP.

This compares to the previous MG Metro with single carb, ~72HP.

So- injection was purely for emissions, it was definitely not a great leap forward for HP.

_________________
DrMini- 1970 wasaMatic 1360, Mk1S crank, 86.6HP (ATW) =~125 @ crank, 45 Dellorto (38 chokes), RE282 sprint cam, 1.5 rockers, 11.0:1 C/R. :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 2:41 pm 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 9:45 pm
Posts: 4031
Location: Adelaide, SA
78 bhp produced by the Cooper S was the most powerful stock 1275 produced I think. They did make those very rare John Cooper Rovers, but the are overated at 90bhp. And the even rarer ERA turbo Minis.

Second to Cooper S is MG Metro I believe. A 1.3i is a good decently pwered engine. Not high performance by any means but qill keep up in traffic. The made around the 60bhp mark I think (all these figures are flywheel figures.)

_________________
1964 Morris 850, 1330 Supercharged - 81.8hp atws.
1975 Leyland Mini S 1100S powered - Nice and reliable.
1977 Leyland Mini LS - Project LS-T 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 2:51 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 30, 2004 7:12 pm
Posts: 1458
Location: Adelaide
Moriarty wrote:
I can appreciate that the engineering (hopefully!) improved over the years, but also would like to hear about any power improvements etc. Not looking for a drag car by any means!
Cheers


I think you may be dissapointed in the figures.

The Engineering "improvements" as I understand were aimed at lowering manufacturing costs while meeting ever tougher anti-pollution laws, than making things more exciting for the driver.

The change to EFI - the oft quoted prof of engineering "improvement" was the only way to meet the emmissions targets - it did bugger all for added power.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Rover
PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 3:03 pm 
Offline
1360cc
1360cc
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 11:32 am
Posts: 12390
Location: Sthrn HiLoLands, NSW, Australia
Leigh...as above, you can get more power from a few sensible mods to an A or A+, however, if you want Air Con and absolutely all the room under the bonnet taken up....well go for it :shock:

_________________
"Show me the Mini!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rover
PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 10:53 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 4:41 pm
Posts: 665
Location: Inner West, Sydney
9YaTaH wrote:
if you want Air Con and absolutely all the room under the bonnet taken up....well go for it :shock:


Well, i was thinking of putting in a pool and a zen garden, but perhaps I'll just stick with the current arrangements and look to make some renovations... 8)


Cheers for all the knowledgeable and prompt advice folks!!! :mrgreen:

_________________
the internet wrote:
Like Audrey Hepburn, almost everybody loves the Mini. The only people who didn't love the Mini were pathetic, empty people.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 3:03 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 4:41 pm
Posts: 665
Location: Inner West, Sydney
What about the late 80s model carburettor 998s? Are they the same physical size as the 1960s engines?

_________________
the internet wrote:
Like Audrey Hepburn, almost everybody loves the Mini. The only people who didn't love the Mini were pathetic, empty people.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 3:17 pm 
Offline
Postally Verbose
Postally Verbose
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 9:12 am
Posts: 19595
Location: Northern NSW
yes , the blocks were basically the same size all the way through , various things changed along the way (they even lost the distributer towards the end ) but the block/gearbox are around the same size , just minor changes .

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 5:44 pm 
Offline
Give Ash some flowers Nick .
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 1:22 pm
Posts: 10149
Location: Toowoomba Region, QLD
The 90hp conversions done on the late 90's mini's never (usually) actually pull 90hp on a dyno. I hear the Burlen 52mm (is it 52mm???) throttle body is a good upgrade with the 90hp conversion - with that it does start to pull about 90hp.

_________________
"In two years time your car will be like a lady's clothes, out of date, my car will still be in fashion when I am dead" - Sir Alec speaking to Pininfarina


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 9:10 am 
Offline
1360cc
1360cc

Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 4:36 pm
Posts: 7673
with efi i imagine the fuel economy is drastically improved, and throttle response too.. cold starts are a breeze..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 9:25 am 
Offline
1360cc
1360cc
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:07 pm
Posts: 10653
Location: SE Melbourne
Spaceboy wrote:
with efi i imagine the fuel economy is drastically improved, and throttle response too.. cold starts are a breeze..


They get around on about 6 litres per 100 kays or so (specs) but drivers claim
it can be more like 8-10.
They are very smooth to drive as well. :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 2:00 pm 
Offline
I want to have Al's babies
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 12:51 pm
Posts: 4253
Harley wrote:
Spaceboy wrote:
with efi i imagine the fuel economy is drastically improved, and throttle response too.. cold starts are a breeze..


They get around on about 6 litres per 100 kays or so (specs) but drivers claim
it can be more like 8-10.
They are very smooth to drive as well. :D


My carby fed '92 specs 6.8 to 100k.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

© 2016 Ausmini. All garage work involves equal measures of enthusiasm, ingenuity and a fair degree of irresponsibility.