Christoph wrote:
I think back in they day they had higher value because the monograde oils werent so good and thinned significantly compared with out modern multigrades of today.
Mick- arent tight bearing clearances a bad thing on a hot motor? they cause bearings to seise and spin from memory due to increased thermal expansion from excess heat. Wouldnt this mean an oil cooler would be a good insurance? im not sure i might be wrong...
Hah..this threads rambling "all over the show" (as Bazza used to say)
I thnk you are right Chris....oils werent oils back in the 1960s....a lot of development has gone into them in the intervening years. So yes, the value of the cooler in keeping the temp down and providing a little more volume and circulation would have been an advantage back then (and for production racing too Doc!!).
Don't forget also the advances in radiator coolants and the way they can now help an engine run cooler....a lot of people back then would just have been using plain old water and some soluble oil! (supposedly to lubricate the old fashioned water pumps on cars that were around then).
Tight Bearings....I meant, as opposed to, totally stuffed bearings showing base metal in a road car (go back to the original question).....maybe I should have said good bearings or new bearings (noooo they are tight!!). Racing clearances can be more genereous because everything is usually been trued up and balanced.
Wot ya doing this weekend? I would like to come over and quickly check out 850 door sills
