Ausmini
It is currently Thu Jun 26, 2025 3:39 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 12:59 pm 
Offline
1360cc
1360cc
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:07 pm
Posts: 10653
Location: SE Melbourne
Sorry to post this if it's a regular thread but I'm too lazy to search.
I've found an engine I want to put in my car, aside from that, the car cost and the usual suspects of rego, blah blah blah, what other expensive factors should I need to be aware of? EG What would engineering cost roughly, and what else could I be up for?

Thanks.
:D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 1:29 pm 
Offline
ET 13.457 seconds , OH YEAH !!!!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 8:35 am
Posts: 7826
Location: Somewhere Around Sydney
If you are confident you can keep it stock....

Engineering ~$800up

What Motor?

Have you got the frame sorted out?

Depending on the motor you chose a brake upgrade..

_________________
Image
Starlet Conversion:
http://www.ausmini.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=15484


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 3:01 pm 
Offline
1360cc
1360cc
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:07 pm
Posts: 10653
Location: SE Melbourne
Engine I'm looking at is a JB-DET from a Daihatsu Copen.

I dont have it yet, so no subframe.

As for brakes I have a few sets of 8.4 solids, some metros and if I get carried
away I'll look at four wheel setups.

I just figured I should look at the costs before I commit to an engine.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 3:22 pm 
Offline
ET 13.457 seconds , OH YEAH !!!!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 8:35 am
Posts: 7826
Location: Somewhere Around Sydney
it's quite a small motor, i would really look at weighing the benefits againsts the cost vs going something like a well built turbo a-series..

There was a Copen at our dyno day, owned by Justin and it made 56HP at the wheels with an upgrade kit.

Look at where it sits below compared to all the A-Series..
Image

My NA Small Block made more power...and that's reliable, driven it to Melbourne, Track Days, etc...

IMO i wouldn't go near the hassle of a conversion for only that much gain when there is nothing wrong with a good A-Series. Conversions are only really practical when you want over 150HP

_________________
Image
Starlet Conversion:
http://www.ausmini.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=15484


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 3:32 pm 
Offline
1360cc
1360cc
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:07 pm
Posts: 10653
Location: SE Melbourne
I'm looking at it based on a cost thing.
I have 2 a series engines and each could do with a full rebuild.
I don't want to spend that money on both, and for a similar cost to a rebuild
I can have a near new jap engine in the car.
I'm yet to make a final decision, just need to add up all my options.

Thanks.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 3:52 pm 
Offline
ET 13.457 seconds , OH YEAH !!!!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 8:35 am
Posts: 7826
Location: Somewhere Around Sydney
You got the engine - a rebuild would cost what...$3-5k TOPS for something really good with decent power.

With Conversion:
- Subframe could cost anything really...$1000 for a rough guide
- Engineering $800
- Insurance Increase.
- Drive Shafts. ~$500+
- Fuel Tank + Lines for Fuel Injection
- Fuel Pumps
- Miscellaneous Custom Work for Gear Linkages, Cluch etc.
- Plus Motor, Brakes etc that are common to both.

Whatever you think it's going to cost. Double it.

_________________
Image
Starlet Conversion:
http://www.ausmini.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=15484


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 4:23 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 3:12 pm
Posts: 1461
Location: Brisbane
Mini Mad wrote:
Whatever you think it's going to cost. Double it.


At a minimum double it....

_________________
If you want more inches, stroke it
Life's a garden.... Dig It!
http://www.ausmini.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=20746


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 4:24 pm 
Offline
ET 13.457 seconds , OH YEAH !!!!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 8:35 am
Posts: 7826
Location: Somewhere Around Sydney
Gordo wrote:
Mini Mad wrote:
Whatever you think it's going to cost. Double it.


At a minimum double it....


:lol: Triple Double.

_________________
Image
Starlet Conversion:
http://www.ausmini.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=15484


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 4:25 pm 
Offline
ET 13.457 seconds , OH YEAH !!!!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 8:35 am
Posts: 7826
Location: Somewhere Around Sydney
Harley wrote:
I'm looking at it based on a cost thing.


I gurantee you an A-series with the same power output as that motor is a much more cost viable option.

_________________
Image
Starlet Conversion:
http://www.ausmini.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=15484


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 9:40 pm 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 7:19 pm
Posts: 5370
Location: Yandina,Sunshine Coast,QLD
Alright I heard somewhere that 1.6+forced induction or 1.8 N/A is the limits of what we can put in our minis, correct?
Why arn't their many of these getting around? everyone seems to be doing 1.3 turbos :? Shorley theirs more power in these bigger engines.

_________________
Respect mine and I'll respect yours.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 10:05 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 3:36 pm
Posts: 1581
Location: melbourne
bigger donks usually weigh more, and are a larger size eg. a 1.8 vtec is taller then a 1.6 vtec and requires it to sit lower in the subframe to clear the bonnet.
besides its always fun to squeeze out power from the underdog smaller engines. if i was doing a conversion i'd be looking at a well balanced car, enough HP that you could use in conjunction with good cornering. i'd learn towards a 4efte, around the same weight as a A series, small capacity (fuel economy)
my 2c

_________________
real men race downhill - keiichi tsuchiya


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 3:06 pm 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 9:45 pm
Posts: 4031
Location: Adelaide, SA
4EFTE?

For me, because ther is already one on the road here in SA, and I'm good friends with the very talented bloke who built it.

I'd probably prefer a Honda 1.8, or even K20, but I think that's going too far.

The stock 4EFTE makes good power, you'd have a 100kw Mini and reliability as the motors stock, that's what I'm going for. Band for buck it won't be worth it but, I'll have ~95 hp atws, great fuel economy (compared to a turbo A series of the same output) and great reliability. Although it won't have that tough A-series sound anymore. :cry:

_________________
1964 Morris 850, 1330 Supercharged - 81.8hp atws.
1975 Leyland Mini S 1100S powered - Nice and reliable.
1977 Leyland Mini LS - Project LS-T 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 7:24 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 3:12 pm
Posts: 1461
Location: Brisbane
The regs are that... For turbo or super charged its 2.5 x the ORIGIONAL tare wieght. For naturally aspirated its 3 x the ORIGIONAL tare wieght and they'll give you an engine capacity in cc's. I dont know about you but the weight i found for my van was 597kg and that was the lightest wieght i could find even though the heaviest noted wieght was only like 20kg more (fuel??) 2.5 x 600 gives you 1500cc for turbos and 3 x 600 gives you 1800 for naturally aspirated

thats my 2c worth

_________________
If you want more inches, stroke it
Life's a garden.... Dig It!
http://www.ausmini.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=20746


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 7:47 pm 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 9:45 pm
Posts: 4031
Location: Adelaide, SA
As far as I'm aware, the cc's related to car mass is not a part of SA law, there is much info on engine changes but they come under different catagories.

Has the law changed, or is SA just behind ( 8) )?

_________________
1964 Morris 850, 1330 Supercharged - 81.8hp atws.
1975 Leyland Mini S 1100S powered - Nice and reliable.
1977 Leyland Mini LS - Project LS-T 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 7:35 pm 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 3183
Location: Burpengary, Queensland - Home of Tricky Performance Engineering
Gordo wrote:
The regs are that... For turbo or super charged its 2.5 x the ORIGIONAL tare wieght. For naturally aspirated its 3 x the ORIGIONAL tare wieght and they'll give you an engine capacity in cc's. I dont know about you but the weight i found for my van was 597kg and that was the lightest wieght i could find even though the heaviest noted wieght was only like 20kg more (fuel??) 2.5 x 600 gives you 1500cc for turbos and 3 x 600 gives you 1800 for naturally aspirated

thats my 2c worth


Gordo,

When I quizzed my engineer on this, he used kerb weight, not Tare!

So, the figures I was told was 1600cc max for forced induction, and 1950cc for N/A.

Cheers,
Tricky

_________________
"Not Speeding Officer..........Qualifying"


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

© 2016 Ausmini. All garage work involves equal measures of enthusiasm, ingenuity and a fair degree of irresponsibility.