ausmini https://ausmini.com/forums/ |
|
1098 shaft dilemmas.. pleeasseee help... :( https://ausmini.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=33432 |
Page 1 of 3 |
Author: | spraycanmansam [ Sun Jul 01, 2007 12:29 am ] |
Post subject: | 1098 shaft dilemmas.. pleeasseee help... :( |
Hi guys, I've searched around, read a few things, but I'm still all screwed up in the head about which cam I should use in my engine build. At the moment I have a cam thats around the 298deg mark with .295 lift and 88deg overlap. But.. I think its going to be a bit big to drive every day ![]() Soo I could really use some recommendations from those that have modified their 1100's as to what cam they used, etc. I am after something that will give me good mid and top end to around 6500rpm, without sacrificing driveability. Heres my planned engine spec so far too -- overbored 1098 with a 12G940 head and 42mm Weber Your help would be SOOO much appreciated as its beginning to play on my mind... ![]() Cheers guys, Sam |
Author: | drmini in aust [ Sun Jul 01, 2007 6:38 am ] |
Post subject: | |
My order of preference for a hot roady 1098- 1. Russell Engineering RE13 2. Camtech VP3 3. Kent MD 266 ![]() |
Author: | spraycanmansam [ Sun Jul 01, 2007 11:43 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Thanks so much, that was pretty much my order as well, (apart from the VP3, havent heard much about it) I just needed some confimation. Anyone got any ideas of how much a RE13 will set me back? Cheers, Sam |
Author: | 1360 LS [ Sun Jul 01, 2007 12:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Call GR directly (02) 9630 2195 ....easiest way |
Author: | Bubbacluby [ Sun Jul 01, 2007 12:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
russel enginering regrind of an existing cam to RE13 i think its about $160 |
Author: | Spaceboy [ Sun Jul 01, 2007 3:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
i think the re-13 is a bit big for daily driving, and the idle is pretty bad so its no good for stop start traffic. beautiful on the open road or through the twisties. i have a 731 cam in my 1100 and its not as wild but still revs out to 7000 have you considered the SW5? http://www.swiftune.co.uk/ |
Author: | drmini in aust [ Sun Jul 01, 2007 4:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Spaceboy wrote: i think the re-13 is a bit big for daily driving, and the idle is pretty bad so its no good for stop start traffic.
beautiful on the open road or through the twisties. i have a 731 cam in my 1100 and its not as wild but still revs out to 7000 have you considered the SW5? http://www.swiftune.co.uk/ RE13 idle is fine, if you just speed it up a bit. ![]() 731 is not really a sparkling cam, I had one. As Vizard said in the yellow book- `lose all the bottom end, gain almost nothing at the top end' The 3 cams I listed would beat the socks off it, and the SW5, IMO. |
Author: | gafmo [ Sun Jul 01, 2007 7:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I have had a 731 cam when Sue's (My wifes) motor was rebuilt. It had good pick up but since rebuilding the box and putting a RE13 it's just that much better. Morris is a Daily drive for Sue and is a 1100+60 RE13 and a HIF44 carb. It performs just as well as similar 1152 with a Dellorto and lighten fly wheel. Remeber this is 'my wifes car', If a RE13 was not drivable 70k's return journey each day in peak hour (Parramatta Rd) I would here about it. If the RE13 cam was too lumpy and not drivable..I would have it out in a second. And My final Point I have 19 month old boy and he sleeps easliy in the back of Morris ![]() |
Author: | pristic [ Sun Jul 01, 2007 7:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Spaceboy wrote: i think the re-13 is a bit big for daily driving, and the idle is pretty bad so its no good for stop start traffic.
beautiful on the open road or through the twisties. i have a 731 cam in my 1100 and its not as wild but still revs out to 7000 have you considered the SW5? http://www.swiftune.co.uk/ Im with Jim on this one... Spaceboy have you actually driven the RE13 and the SW5? I drive mine daily (except in the rain but thats a different story) and its fine... my idle is around 1200-1400rpm Pete. |
Author: | KLAS [ Sun Jul 01, 2007 8:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
IMHO the SW5 is a great modern cam if you want more power and have to pass emission test. i build a MPi engine with it, worked great, but you still have to modify the ECU to get the best of it. and than i can use every other cam as well. but i have no experience with carbed engines and the SW5 the more i read here the more i feel i need a RE cam |
Author: | Spaceboy [ Mon Jul 02, 2007 12:16 am ] |
Post subject: | |
people tend to only post how good the re-13 is, and so i rushed off to get one.. i now have one in my 1360. i wasnt expecting the idle to be so poor, noone had mentioned that before i got one. also the power down low is non-existent.. but she pulls so much harder than before with same specs but 1310cc higher compression and a standard cam. 1200-1400 is too bloody high.. i don't want my engine idling at that speed. i'd get a headache. heres mine http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kk6vmQ5N5gI i would definitely recommend it for a weekend warrior, a club racer or fast road racer. i am iffy about it in a daily.. i do a fair amount of highway work in which its fine, but in heavy traffic it is a bit of a pain yeah i'd love to go and ride with someone who has one in their smallblock and see what its like in there. i'm happy with the 731, but i know its an old design. |
Author: | spraycanmansam [ Mon Jul 02, 2007 12:26 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Man that sounds lumpy as! ... I like! ![]() ![]() ![]() My cars going to be a semi-daily/hot roady. I want a really hot cam but I want there to be SOME power below 3500-4000 rpm ![]() RE13 looks like it fits the bill... |
Author: | drmini in aust [ Mon Jul 02, 2007 7:57 am ] |
Post subject: | |
The RE13 in my 1310 WITH 1.5:1 rockers came in hard before 2500. With standard rockers it will hit sooner. I now have an RE282 in the 1360, it's on cam properly at 2900 but I can pull from 2000 at light throttle (45 Dellorto and 38mm chokes), I can still drive about in 60KMH traffic in 4th gear. 3.65 diff helps.... ![]() |
Author: | Spaceboy [ Mon Jul 02, 2007 1:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
drmini in aust wrote: 3.65 diff helps....
![]() aha! ![]() |
Author: | drmini in aust [ Mon Jul 02, 2007 1:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Spaceboy wrote: drmini in aust wrote: 3.65 diff helps.... ![]() aha! ![]() It actually climbs hills at 2500 in 4th, at 60KMH there's SFA difference between a 3.65 and a 3.44. ![]() 15.7 vs 16.1 MPH/1000 |
Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |