Ausmini
It is currently Sun Jul 06, 2025 4:53 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Compression ratio v ULP
PostPosted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 9:03 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc

Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 11:10 pm
Posts: 20
Location: Adelaide South Australia
Hi all.
I'm rebuilding a Jap import A+ at present to go in my clubby & thinking about running it on everyday 91 octane ULP.
Can anyone tell me what compression ratio I can run using ULP, no engine management system, just a good old SU & Pulsar dizzy.
I know some new cars run maybe 10:1, but their engine management continually adjusts timing when it detects pinging.
Thanks
Scotty.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 9:18 pm 
Offline
religious status
religious status
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 6:19 pm
Posts: 39753
Location: near Baulkham Hills, NSW
I run a 1293 A+ on 95 usually, it will run on 91 but pings a bit.
C/R is around 9.3:1.
Carbs are twin HS4, cam is a 270* Tight 104..
Dizzy is a Pulsar D4R85, with advance slots modified to give 10* dizzy advance.
What you can run is VERY dependent on the camshaft duration and overlap.

_________________
DrMini- 1970 wasaMatic 1360, Mk1S crank, 86.6HP (ATW) =~125 @ crank, 45 Dellorto (38 chokes), RE282 sprint cam, 1.5 rockers, 11.0:1 C/R. :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 11:33 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc

Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 12:33 am
Posts: 276
Location: Western Australia
yeah exactly what the doc said. It's your cam more than anything which determines where you can set your compression ratio...

this happens basically because the more 'radical' your cam is the later the inlet valve closes.... so you effectively have less fuel/air mixture in your cylinder (yeah I know... not always the case but lets not go there)

here's a rough guide running 91 octane fuel...

mild road cam (cooper s type spec) aim at about 7.5:1

fast road cam (270 deg type spec) aim at about 8:1

raod/rally cam (280 - 290 deg type spec) aim at about 9:1

race cam (300 deg plus type spec) anywhere from 10:1 plus

If you went up to 96 octane fuel you could add about half a point to each of these...

I would consider these safe numbers :)

Good Luck


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 6:14 am 
Offline
religious status
religious status
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 6:19 pm
Posts: 39753
Location: near Baulkham Hills, NSW
miniobsessed, I think your numbers are a bit low, by 0.5 at least. :wink:

I'm wondering WHY anybody would build a performance Mini motor to run on 91 RON, they are are throwing HP away with low C/R. :shock:

My other car with a 1360 and RE282 cam, modified Pulsar dizzy too is running nice at 10.7:1. It only drinks 98, but apart from Tassie, that's available in most places anyway now.
No it doesn't ping- GR says with this cam I could raise it a bit more. 8)

_________________
DrMini- 1970 wasaMatic 1360, Mk1S crank, 86.6HP (ATW) =~125 @ crank, 45 Dellorto (38 chokes), RE282 sprint cam, 1.5 rockers, 11.0:1 C/R. :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 9:25 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc

Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 11:10 pm
Posts: 20
Location: Adelaide South Australia
Thanks for you input guys.
I 'm not actually building a performance motor as such, just refreshing a standard A+. So if the standard c/r is I think about 8.8:1, then it should run happily on 95 if not 91RON?
Kevin, what total advance would you recommend for this motor with auto trans & standard cam?
Cheers
Scotty.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 9:57 pm 
Offline
religious status
religious status
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 6:19 pm
Posts: 39753
Location: near Baulkham Hills, NSW
With 8.8:1 C/R I'd definitely run it on 95, not 91.
Be careful though, some A+ motors were higher than 8.8.

re the advance, I'd mod the advance plate to reduce centrifugal advance to 10* (dizzy degrees), and set full advance with vac line off to about 28-30* using a timing light.
Total advance is much more important than static.... :wink:

_________________
DrMini- 1970 wasaMatic 1360, Mk1S crank, 86.6HP (ATW) =~125 @ crank, 45 Dellorto (38 chokes), RE282 sprint cam, 1.5 rockers, 11.0:1 C/R. :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 5:05 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 9:50 am
Posts: 247
Location: East Vic Park (WA)
Sorry for the (minor) hijack, but I know that increasing CR improves efficiency and power, with the disadvantage being pinging if the CR is too high. Has anybody actually looked at the effect it has on efficiency and whether it is worth increasing CR and running on higher octane, more expensive fuel?

Basically, does anyone know if the decrease in fuel consumption and the increase in fuel cost offset each other, or will it still work out more expensive?

Not that fuel consumption and price is necessarily a major factor in a car such as a mini :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 5:20 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 6:40 am
Posts: 1943
Location: New Zealand (whangarei)
hmmmm, some a+ engines were 10.5:1 standard, with a cam similar to the 544.

_________________
speed costs....how fast do you want to go...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:38 am 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 12:03 pm
Posts: 179
Location: SCONE N.S.W 2337
i have a lightly modifyed 1098 and it pings on 91 but i use 98 now and it runs alot better and doesn't ping. After i build it up the CR will be 10:1.. :lol: 8)

_________________
@#$%Things are not what they used to be
Missing one inside of me
Deadly loss, this can't be real
Cannot stand this hell I feel
Emptiness is filling me
To the point of agony
Growing darkness taking dawn.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 9:03 am 
Offline
1360cc
1360cc
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 6858
Location: Special Tuning Sydney
richarde wrote:
Sorry for the (minor) hijack, but I know that increasing CR improves efficiency and power, with the disadvantage being pinging if the CR is too high. Has anybody actually looked at the effect it has on efficiency and whether it is worth increasing CR and running on higher octane, more expensive fuel?

Basically, does anyone know if the decrease in fuel consumption and the increase in fuel cost offset each other, or will it still work out more expensive?

Not that fuel consumption and price is necessarily a major factor in a car such as a mini :D


I think this topic is covered pretty extensively in Vizard's yellow book under "Tuning for Economy". Can't remember what he recommends for economy tuning as I really don't care... :P

_________________
Lillee - 1969 Morris Mini K


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 9:21 am 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 12:03 pm
Posts: 179
Location: SCONE N.S.W 2337
lol, people that worry about fuel prices, shouldn't have a car

_________________
@#$%Things are not what they used to be
Missing one inside of me
Deadly loss, this can't be real
Cannot stand this hell I feel
Emptiness is filling me
To the point of agony
Growing darkness taking dawn.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 4:13 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 9:50 am
Posts: 247
Location: East Vic Park (WA)
Lillee wrote:
richarde wrote:
Sorry for the (minor) hijack, but I know that increasing CR improves efficiency and power, with the disadvantage being pinging if the CR is too high. Has anybody actually looked at the effect it has on efficiency and whether it is worth increasing CR and running on higher octane, more expensive fuel?

Basically, does anyone know if the decrease in fuel consumption and the increase in fuel cost offset each other, or will it still work out more expensive?

Not that fuel consumption and price is necessarily a major factor in a car such as a mini :D


I think this topic is covered pretty extensively in Vizard's yellow book under "Tuning for Economy". Can't remember what he recommends for economy tuning as I really don't care... :P


yeah, i never really got around to reading that chapter as there are more important things to worry about then fuel economy :) I was just wondering is all.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

© 2016 Ausmini. All garage work involves equal measures of enthusiasm, ingenuity and a fair degree of irresponsibility.