Harley wrote:
The engine I want to throw in a mini would come out of a Smart Roadster.
3 cyl, 600cc turbo, with 6-speed. Only uses 4L per 100km too.
What on earth for??? The engine sucks.
I had a Smart ForTwo for 2 weeks a couple of weeks ago when I had my wisdom teeth out (could not get my bike helmet on)
Hmmm...698cc 3cyl turbo producing a pathetic 60kw. You have to flog the living crap outta it to get it to go anywhere and even then. the redline is a mere 6,500rpm. 1st burnout are impossible, although with some effort, you can get it to drift in 2nd.
The shift pattern is back to front. Up to go up and down to go down. Should be the other way around to work with the physics of acceleration.
4L/100km??? Maybe if you were on the highway at a constant speed with a tail wind, but around town it is nowhere near that. More like 6-7L/100km. No better than the 1.6L Pulsar I had a couple of years ago.
In reality, the Smart cars a are totally overated and TOTALLY overpriced.
That being said, IMHO, they are the ultimate car (after the mini) for inner city living and peak hour traffic. Oh...and the heated seats rock on cold mornings! If they had a $12K price point, they would sell heaps of them.
Oh, and I would say a Morris 1100S 1415 stroker with one of the new turbos Nissan has developed. They are electric motor assisted, so they are always spooled. Instant power like an SC without the increased fuel consumption from stolen power.
_________________
Morphias.
_______________________________________________
If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much space...