Ausmini
It is currently Tue Jul 08, 2025 3:38 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 3:49 pm 
Offline
This space for rent
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:40 pm
Posts: 5455
Location: Melbourne
drmini in aust wrote:
I guess as a positive there's less end thrust on the bearings, but I would expect their life in a daily driver to be less. I've seen a few sets wear through the hardening, something helicals seldom seem to do. :wink:


Yeah, probably has something to do with the applied force being shared between the meshing teeth.. more teeth meshed in a helical set means less wear per tooth which means longer life.. I suppose ;)

So what's all this noise (pun not intended) about straight cut drop gears then? Is that application susceptible to end thrust causing increased bearing wear? (I read something about the drop gears being a weakness in the A-series design, but I can't remember why)..

Oh, and sorry for the hijack! :oops:

_________________
Simon

The adventures of an owner builder in the Tallarook Ranges

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 4:23 pm 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 9:08 pm
Posts: 1683
Location: Bris Vegas Occupation: Engineer
sgc wrote:
1970 mini K wrote:
everybody has a diff opinion on g/boxes, matt the mini man thinks helical cut gears are better then straight cuts (i've heard that in many places)


Yeah, I've heard people crowing on about how much stronger straight cut gears are than helical.. which I can't understand. With a straight cut gearset, you have basically only one tooth in contact with the next gear at a time, but with a helical arrangement there's at least two at all times.

Anyone got an authoritative answer?


Aftermarket gear sets should be made of stronger materials to make up for the higher shear stresses associated with straight cut gears. If they are made of the same materials then straight cut can't be stronger, it doesn't make sense as the shear planes are smaller and the torque transfer is more intermittent.

The main problem with the Mini box is gear separation, either due to wear or from casing distortion. Once this happens then the contact point on each gear moves further toward the tip and this increases this shear stress dramatically at the root, shearing the teeth off.

Building a box with new bearings and layshaft will give a good service life but at high torque levels its possible it will still come undone.

Straight cut gears produce low thrust loads and result in less power loss, generating less heat as well.

Daniel

_________________
Videos - Turbocharged A-Series on Dyno & at Wakefield
Mafs waz not my strong subgeckt at skkol


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 6:20 am 
Offline
848cc
848cc

Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 12:53 pm
Posts: 42
Location: Hawthorn, Vic, Australia
Port injection is a waste of time, the common opinion is port injection will reduce fuel consumption, as most commerical systems inject fuel on a closed valve, and thus the fuel atomizes nicely as it warmed by the valve.

However port injecting in a siamese head is pointless, as you can't injected on a closed valve. you have to use tuned seqential port injection, which would injected on a open valve to prevent charge stealing.

Mega squirt can't do tuned seqential port injection, and thus even on a 8 or 7 port head, is just going to batch fire on all 4 ports. It has only 2 injector channels.

The reason for going to fuel injection in turbo, is easy of setup for blown threw setups (people disagree, but in my humble opinion, blown threw is better as it prevents the fuel from being thrown out of the air), no need for special carb work. Also it allows highly specific turning, and also as protection factor if a knock sensor is fitted, it can detect and retard ingition.

Go for the 1275, and if you go 8 port, you'll need a plenuim with mega squirt.

And as it is a mini look at microsquirt, it's what i plan to use for my injection/ignition setup.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 11:09 am 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 8:52 am
Posts: 734
Location: NSW Australia
I was under the impression I could batch fire in pairs with megasquirt. Ie. 1 + 4, 3 + 2. But isnt batch fire how most efi setups work?

I know sequential is what would be the best setup, as if setup properly is most efficient and all that, but what will work with megasquirt and 8 port?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 11:24 am 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 9:08 pm
Posts: 1683
Location: Bris Vegas Occupation: Engineer
lovely2 wrote:
Port injection is a waste of time, the common opinion is port injection will reduce fuel consumption, as most commerical systems inject fuel on a closed valve, and thus the fuel atomizes nicely as it warmed by the valve.

However port injecting in a siamese head is pointless, as you can't injected on a closed valve. you have to use tuned seqential port injection, which would injected on a open valve to prevent charge stealing.


I slightly disagree. If the inlet valve is open or closed it is still hot and helps to atomise the fuel irrespective of the time it's injected, however this is not the reason for port injection.

If you have the injectors anywhere else then the manifold must have turbulance to keep the fuel in suspension, this means lost power or fuel distribution problems if it's not employed.

New cars are using fuel injecting direct into the cylinder. The atomisation issue is therefore a spray pattern issue, not a heating issue since they don't spray onto the valve at all.

Using EFI is not for fuel consumption, it's about managing the tuning requirements in real time. Carby's cannot achieve the flexibility of different fuels for example, with the right managment system it will adjust to suit 91 or 95 or 98 if required. There is no leaded fuel anymore and pretty soon there will be all sorts of fuel blends given the current climate, what are people going to do then, adjust their SU's at the servo?

Regards

Daniel

_________________
Videos - Turbocharged A-Series on Dyno & at Wakefield
Mafs waz not my strong subgeckt at skkol


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 11:33 am 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 9:08 pm
Posts: 1683
Location: Bris Vegas Occupation: Engineer
rampage101 wrote:
I was under the impression I could batch fire in pairs with megasquirt. Ie. 1 + 4, 3 + 2. But isnt batch fire how most efi setups work?

I know sequential is what would be the best setup, as if setup properly is most efficient and all that, but what will work with megasquirt and 8 port?


For a 4cyl turbo you will have relatively large injectors so at idle & low throttle openings it obviously would be best to have sequential to fire the fuel at the correct time to not have it sitting in the manifold.

Running the batch fire will be ok for port injection on the 8-porter, obviously some of the fuel will evaporate (and not burn), fuel consumption may be slightly higher but I doubt you will notice.

The biggest problem with running a turbo is the reduced compression ratio, this is more of a problem for fuel consuption/economy than anything else, except when under boost conditions of course.

Regards

Daniel

_________________
Videos - Turbocharged A-Series on Dyno & at Wakefield
Mafs waz not my strong subgeckt at skkol


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 1:27 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc

Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 12:53 pm
Posts: 42
Location: Hawthorn, Vic, Australia
rampage101 wrote:
I was under the impression I could batch fire in pairs with megasquirt. Ie. 1 + 4, 3 + 2. But isnt batch fire how most efi setups work?

I know sequential is what would be the best setup, as if setup properly is most efficient and all that, but what will work with megasquirt and 8 port?


You can batch fire like that, but isn't ideal.

Have a look at vemms it a offshoot of megasquirt, it documentation is not the best.

DOZ wrote:
Using EFI is not for fuel consumption, it's about managing the tuning requirements in real time. Carby's cannot achieve the flexibility of different fuels for example, with the right managment system it will adjust to suit 91 or 95 or 98 if required. There is no leaded fuel anymore and pretty soon there will be all sorts of fuel blends given the current climate, what are people going to do then, adjust their SU's at the servo?


Completely agree, in closed loop operation of efi it is very adapterable. This does however require a exhaust oxygen sensor. It the reason why i plan to TBI on a small bore, and just change ejectors over when i convert to big bore.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:55 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 8:52 am
Posts: 734
Location: NSW Australia
Any more details on vemms, has a quick google but couldn't find anything.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:08 pm 
Offline
998cc
998cc
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 8:52 am
Posts: 734
Location: NSW Australia
Nevermind, but for anyone else interested:
http://www.vems.hu/wiki/index.php?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:25 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc

Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 12:53 pm
Posts: 42
Location: Hawthorn, Vic, Australia
sorry for the spelling mistake. :(


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

© 2016 Ausmini. All garage work involves equal measures of enthusiasm, ingenuity and a fair degree of irresponsibility.