ausmini https://ausmini.com/forums/ |
|
Another camshaft question. https://ausmini.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=94931 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | 70K1100 [ Thu Feb 23, 2017 2:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Another camshaft question. |
Can anyone tell me if there will be much improvement fitting a 266ss cam with a standard 202 head? I was looking at a 997 cam as an option. |
Author: | 70K1100 [ Fri Feb 24, 2017 11:42 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Another camshaft question. |
???? |
Author: | drmini in aust [ Fri Feb 24, 2017 5:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Another camshaft question. |
I've used both in 1098s, the 266 beats the 997 for torque and HP. 997 was a good cam, in its day. |
Author: | danny_ [ Fri Feb 24, 2017 5:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Another camshaft question. |
+1 on the 266ss, Great cam. |
Author: | 70K1100 [ Fri Feb 24, 2017 11:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Another camshaft question. |
So a standard 202 head won't kill off all the performance gains? I'd much prefer to buy the 266ss cam and get my car running and save for a modified head later. |
Author: | drmini in aust [ Sat Feb 25, 2017 6:56 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Another camshaft question. |
It will be fine. I used 202 heads just with minor mods. |
Author: | simon k [ Sat Feb 25, 2017 8:51 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Another camshaft question. |
NOT850 wrote: So a standard 202 head won't kill off all the performance gains? I'd much prefer to buy the 266ss cam and get my car running and save for a modified head later. much easier to change a head later... a camshaft, not so easy |
Author: | 70K1100 [ Sat Feb 25, 2017 8:58 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Another camshaft question. |
Simon that's what I was thinking. I've done an internet search and the 998 A+ engine runs smaller valves and much higher compression that the 1098. I was hoping on building the bottom end to the spec I want with flat top pistons and do the head later. |
Author: | justminis [ Sat Feb 25, 2017 5:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Another camshaft question. |
If you are thinking of running flat top pistons then consider sourcing a Cooper #295 head which has bigger combustion chambers to suit flat tops and bigger valves and better porting than std 202 head. |
Author: | drmini in aust [ Sat Feb 25, 2017 6:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Another camshaft question. |
A 202 head can be made to breathe as well or better than a 295. See Graham Russell. |
Author: | 70K1100 [ Sun Feb 26, 2017 12:57 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Another camshaft question. |
I spoke with Graham Russell a couple of months ago and I have to say that I was really impressed with how easy he was to speak to. That's when I got a rough price on a new 202 head. |
Author: | 70K1100 [ Thu Apr 13, 2017 12:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Another camshaft question. |
Just yet another quick question, the C-AEA526 valve springs the better ones to suit the 266ss cam or can I get away with the C-AEA525 springs from Minispares? |
Author: | drmini in aust [ Thu Apr 13, 2017 1:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Another camshaft question. |
Don't use either of those springs on a small bore head unless running valves from a 1275 which are longer stems. Use Sprite or Cooper double 7000 rpm ones. |
Author: | 70K1100 [ Thu Apr 13, 2017 5:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Another camshaft question. |
Drmini the head will be running 1275 valves. |
Author: | drmini in aust [ Thu Apr 13, 2017 10:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Another camshaft question. |
Well I would use c--aea526. Work fine to 8000 on mine. |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |