ausmini https://ausmini.com/forums/ |
|
pros and cons of a mg metro engine https://ausmini.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=94355 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | mooman10_0 [ Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | pros and cons of a mg metro engine |
As said in the title, whats peoples opinions on pros and cons of a metro engine? Go! |
Author: | whoopspiggy [ Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: pros and cons of a mg metro engine |
whoopspiggy wrote: mooman10_0 wrote: As said in the title, whats peoples opinions on pros and cons of a metro engine? Go! Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
Author: | simon k [ Tue Dec 06, 2016 7:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: pros and cons of a mg metro engine |
it's just an A+ 1275 - no real difference to any other 1275 |
Author: | Willkog89 [ Tue Dec 06, 2016 7:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: pros and cons of a mg metro engine |
Harder to source the actual engine/g-box would be a slight con. |
Author: | timmy201 [ Tue Dec 06, 2016 8:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: pros and cons of a mg metro engine |
simon k wrote: it's just an A+ 1275 - no real difference to any other 1275 As posted in his members thread.. MG Metro was one of the best A+ engines apparently. Higher compression, bigger valves, better cam etc.. http://www.bmcexperience.com.au/bmce-issue6/mg-metro : Quote: The MG Metro benefitted over the Austin version by having a modified camshaft, bigger valves, exhaust extractors and a compression ratio of 10.5:1 (up from 9.4:1). Apart from the fact it had a single HIF44 SU carburettor, the engine had effectively been "Cooperised", to produce 72bhp - the Mini Cooper S had produced 75bhp with twin carbs and 9.7:1 compression. http://www.minimania.com/Engine___Metro ... ation_data : Quote: the one outstanding version is the MG Metro engine. Where the majority of the variously similar power plants put out around 63-65bhp, the MG metro achieves a more spirited 70-74bhp. This is due to a higher compression ratio (10 -1), larger inlet valve (35.7mm instead of 33.3mm), and - mainly - a more sporty camshaft with half-decent induction and exhaust systems. The inlet manifold being a reasonably good flowing, water heated aluminium example. Rover finally got the hint having witnessed the prolific after-market fitment or such an item to Minis in epic proportions for years. The exhaust manifold is a cast iron 'LCB' style with a pair of exhaust downpipes instead of the more common single item and works very efficiently. A bonus of this over the more common after-market steel-tubed LCBs is that it is much quieter by dint of absorbing more exhaust 'noise'. Coupled to a pair of Maniflow tubular steel downpipes it is very nearly as efficient as a full tubular steel manifold. The cylinder head is more along the lines of the old Cooper S spec and in fact flows slightly more air than it's predecessor, the camshaft being the sportiest fitted to any production A-series engine. It uses the inlet profile and timing of the original 997 Cooper cam and the exhaust specification of the old Leyland Special Tuning '731' fast road cam.
|
Author: | mooman10_0 [ Wed Dec 07, 2016 5:20 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: pros and cons of a mg metro engine |
Thanks for the responses. According to article, bigger valves, higher compresion, different ratio gearbox. All sounding good |
Author: | simon k [ Wed Dec 07, 2016 12:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: pros and cons of a mg metro engine |
...and 30 odd years old, needing a rebuild so you're going to modify it anyway, making it the same as any other 1275 |
Author: | mooman10_0 [ Wed Dec 07, 2016 5:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: pros and cons of a mg metro engine |
all good , this one is in good nic, no current rebuild required! ![]() |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |