Ausmini
It is currently Thu Jul 24, 2025 3:24 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 4:41 pm 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 9:45 pm
Posts: 4031
Location: Adelaide, SA
Spaceboy wrote:
slinkey inc wrote:
I've never driven a small bore mini


Yes, I said that for a reason. But I've been passenger in more than a few.

I choose to have a faster car. That's my decision. People talk about smallbore revving out very high etc. How much higher do you need to rev than 6800? My car keeps speeding up and would go over 7000 if I wanted it too but that's a bit silly really.

The point of the tread was simply is a 998 worthless? No, it's not, i've said that twice now.

But the magic number with mini's is 1275 which seems to drive up the price of cars and engines alike. (cars more so becasue of disc brakes).

_________________
1964 Morris 850, 1330 Supercharged - 81.8hp atws.
1975 Leyland Mini S 1100S powered - Nice and reliable.
1977 Leyland Mini LS - Project LS-T 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 9:25 pm 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:45 am
Posts: 2360
Location: SE QLD
Granted Slink however due to the acute shortages of 1275 engines(and the really stupid prices asked for them...), the 998/1100cc road is a choice more and more will be making in the not to distant future. If people wouldnt ask silly money for their (needs a rebuild) motors, maybe the 1275 wouldnt be an entirely out of the question proposal.

At the end of the day we can sit here and argue the point of what is the preferred motor. However the 998cc is not worthless(and will definitely appreciate in years to come). Hence why I am keeping a few in reserve for a rainy day...lol

My 2 bits

Hooroo

_________________
Rob Forsyth
Miniot!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 9:38 pm 
Offline
religious status
religious status
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 6:19 pm
Posts: 39756
Location: near Baulkham Hills, NSW
Many years ago I ran a 1220 motor, 544 cam, 12G940 head, LCB, twin Amal Monobloc carbs then twin HS4s. It revved to 8500, did 16s at Castlereagh drag strip.

It went like stink until a piston circlip broke. Anyway, then I decided if I can't beat em, join em. So I put all the head cam and goodies onto a brand new 1275 short motor. 8)
Surprise surprise, it was nowhere near the same... :cry: :x

_________________
DrMini- 1970 wasaMatic 1360, Mk1S crank, 86.6HP (ATW) =~125 @ crank, 45 Dellorto (38 chokes), RE282 sprint cam, 1.5 rockers, 11.0:1 C/R. :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 9:40 pm 
Offline
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2004 3:35 pm
Posts: 11847
drmini in aust wrote:
Many years ago I ran a 1220 motor, 544 cam, 12G940 head, LCB, twin Amal Monobloc carbs then twin HS4s. It revved to 8500, did 16s at Castlereagh drag strip.

It went like stink until a piston circlip broke. Anyway, then I decided if I can't beat em, join em. So I put all the head cam and goodies onto a brand new 1275 short motor. 8)
Surprise surprise, it was nowhere near the same... :cry: :x


the idea of that engine still excites me.. :)

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 10:18 pm 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 9:45 pm
Posts: 4031
Location: Adelaide, SA
Doc that does sound impressive. 8)

_________________
1964 Morris 850, 1330 Supercharged - 81.8hp atws.
1975 Leyland Mini S 1100S powered - Nice and reliable.
1977 Leyland Mini LS - Project LS-T 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 11:36 pm 
Offline
848cc
848cc
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 10:42 am
Posts: 437
Location: Sydney - east - sth west
CPOCSM wrote:
Granted Slink however due to the acute shortages of 1275 engines(and the really stupid prices asked for them...), the 998/1100cc road is a choice more and more will be making in the not to distant future. If people wouldnt ask silly money for their (needs a rebuild) motors, maybe the 1275 wouldnt be an entirely out of the question proposal.

At the end of the day we can sit here and argue the point of what is the preferred motor. However the 998cc is not worthless(and will definitely appreciate in years to come). Hence why I am keeping a few in reserve for a rainy day...lol

My 2 bits

Hooroo


Am I right in thinking that mini engines 'break' often? owners seem to be changing them a lot??

_________________
YDO005 1965 stock standard MORRIS MINI DELUXE


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 11:50 pm 
Offline
1360cc
1360cc

Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 4:36 pm
Posts: 7673
they're breaking now, 30 and 40 years after they were built 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 7:57 am 
Offline
1275cc
1275cc
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:45 am
Posts: 2360
Location: SE QLD
Mort Subite wrote:
CPOCSM wrote:
Granted Slink however due to the acute shortages of 1275 engines(and the really stupid prices asked for them...), the 998/1100cc road is a choice more and more will be making in the not to distant future. If people wouldnt ask silly money for their (needs a rebuild) motors, maybe the 1275 wouldnt be an entirely out of the question proposal.

At the end of the day we can sit here and argue the point of what is the preferred motor. However the 998cc is not worthless(and will definitely appreciate in years to come). Hence why I am keeping a few in reserve for a rainy day...lol

My 2 bits

Hooroo


Am I right in thinking that mini engines 'break' often? owners seem to be changing them a lot??


Not at all - the motors are fine if they are looked after and routine maintenance is done on them religiously. It is missing this routine stuff that may shorten your motors life(as mentioned in my first post in this thread I have just blown up a 280,000km factory original motor)and therefore here lies the expense - for the sake of a routine oil change every 15-3000 km with filter, basic tune and some genuine TLC, you should have a very reliable car.

Yes they have their little "quirks" however this forum is a wealth of help and advice - I know it has lifted me out of the poo from time to time. Patience and lots of beer usually gets you through(and a bloody heater here in Canberra!!!)

Hooroo

_________________
Rob Forsyth
Miniot!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:03 am 
Offline
Postally Verbose
Postally Verbose
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 9:12 am
Posts: 19595
Location: Northern NSW
DOn't forget either that we're talking about 1940's technology that's now being expected to rev and work reliably far above it's original design specification , how many mini owners here never take their motor above 4,500 rpm and are happy with 30 hp ?

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 10:19 am 
Offline
Give Ash some flowers Nick .
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 1:22 pm
Posts: 10149
Location: Toowoomba Region, QLD
sports850 wrote:
how many mini owners here never take their motor above 4,500 rpm and are happy with 30 hp ?


Well I don't rev my car above 4,500rpm (I go a bit more if I get too over excited but not usually) as it doesn't really feel as though there is that much left after that point.

Happy with 30hp - not a chance!

There's only 1 thing better than horse power - and that's MORE horse power!

_________________
"In two years time your car will be like a lady's clothes, out of date, my car will still be in fashion when I am dead" - Sir Alec speaking to Pininfarina


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 10:46 am 
Offline
1098cc
1098cc

Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 9:25 pm
Posts: 1322
Location: wooToomba
I think that maybe all the talk of engine work may make people think that Minis aren't reliable. Like Wombat's other thread about rebuilding an engine (where everyone's telling him to keep a 998 block out the back as a spare). But I'd reckon that a fair amount of the engine work that gets talked about on here isn't necessitated by problems, it's created by that urge that Sports850's talking about. 8) You can get a bit on a Mini with "bolt on" mods - exhaust and carbies - but you'll get much more if you play with the head, cam (which is an engine out job on a 1275, but not a small bore - one advantage of a small bore), etc. And when you're improving things at the top end, you want to make sure the bottom end's strong enough to handle it. Rob's (CPOCSM) 280,000km factory engine isn't too shabby by modern standards, even better when you consider it's run all that time in its gearbox oil! 8)
For my point of view on this one, a 1275 will give you the highest ultimate power output - dollar for dollar, all things being equal. But there's nothing wrong with the old small bore. Not everyone can afford a big bore. And plainly some don't want a big bore. For mine, as long as it will keep your Mini going, it's worth something! :D But obviously everyone has a different dollar figure - from zero to much more than that. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 10:53 am 
Offline
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2004 3:35 pm
Posts: 11847
1018cc wrote:
There's only 1 thing better than horse power - and that's MORE horse power!


I see you're of the school of thought where, If less is more, just think how much more MORE is..

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 11:18 am 
Offline
1360cc
1360cc

Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 4:36 pm
Posts: 7673
theres only one thing better than horsepower
TORQUE :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 12:19 pm 
Offline
1360cc
1360cc

Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 7:59 pm
Posts: 11749
Spaceboy wrote:
theres only one thing better than horsepower
TORQUE :lol:


and I quote

"Torque and power are inescapably linked by the fact that horsepower equals torque (in ft-pounds) times RPM divided by 5250, so people who talk as if they are independent are full of it. If you have a given torque curve for an engine, you have the horsepower curve also. Knowing how these two numbers work with each other lets you can poke through some of the BS you might read. "


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 12:55 pm 
Offline
Resident Test Pilot
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 8:13 am
Posts: 1131
Location: Depends on the day !
I have a 998 in the 850. Its a ripper. Whilst I would like to get my hands on 1275 I think that the small bore is more than enough for "Morris".
Twin 1.25, extractors and the soon to be added 295 head and cam will be more than enough for his drum brakes. And in NSW I believe that if I was to go with 1275 I would also have to change to disc brakes. So....small bore are definitely worth holding onto or on selling.
The addition of the 1100 crank would up the power again. It all comes down to how much power do you want. IMO.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: JM1275 and 110 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

© 2016 Ausmini. All garage work involves equal measures of enthusiasm, ingenuity and a fair degree of irresponsibility.